Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests
- To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...133...>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...696...>, nbd-general@...72..., Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@...124...>, linux-kernel@...25...
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:03:06 +0000
- Message-id: <FF1216D8-C4B3-405E-A4F6-82196A796A94@...872...>
- In-reply-to: <20130212133207.ef6b24f5.akpm@...133...>
- References: <1360685171-3792-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@...696...> <1360685171-3792-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@...696...> <115932E2-48BE-406E-9E75-61D12EB5937A@...872...> <511A8491.5030407@...696...> <20130212133207.ef6b24f5.akpm@...133...>
On 12 Feb 2013, at 21:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Obviously the changelog was inadequate. Please send along a new one
> which fully describes the reasons for this change.
To be clear I have no complaints about the rest of the patch being
merged. Supporting FLUSH but not FUA is far better than supporting
neither. I just didn't understand dropping FUA given the semantics
of nbd is in essence 'linux bios over tcp'.
--
Alex Bligh
Reply to: