Re: extension of lsb packages
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 20:32:52 -0500
"Joey Hess" <joey@kitenet.net> wrote:
> unsigned char magic[4];
> unsigned char major, minor;
> short type;
> short archnum;
> char name[66];
> short osnum;
> short signature_type;
> short lsb_compliant;
> char reserved[15];
> };
I forgot about the reserved bits -- that's obviously a better way to do this then I suggested as it will preserve compatibility with old versions of RPM (though a byte will suffice).
Erik
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Distracting? I'm inspiring" |
| - Sally Bowles in Cabaret |
Reply to: