[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#836376: marked as done (unpack conflicts with '/usr/lib/apt/solvers/dump' from apt-utils when upgrading from jessie to sid)



Your message dated Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:37:19 +0000
with message-id <E1bftL5-0004xT-6u@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#836220: fixed in apt 1.3~rc4
has caused the Debian Bug report #836220,
regarding unpack conflicts with '/usr/lib/apt/solvers/dump' from apt-utils when upgrading from jessie to sid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
836220: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836220
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt
Version: 1.3~rc3
Severity: serious

Hi,

seems /usr/lib/apt/solvers/dump moved from apt-utils to apt... causing
upgrade conflic when going from jessie to sidt:

Preparing to unpack .../archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking apt (1.3~rc3) over (1.0.9.8.3) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/apt/solvers/dump', which is also in
package apt-utils 1.0.9.8.3
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Reinstalling /etc/cron.daily/apt that was moved away
Selecting previously unselected package libapt-pkg5.0:amd64.
dpkg: considering deconfiguration of apt, which would be broken by
installation of libapt-pkg5.0:amd64 ...
dpkg: yes, will deconfigure apt (broken by libapt-pkg5.0:amd64)
Preparing to unpack .../libapt-pkg5.0_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb ...
De-configuring apt (1.0.9.8.3) ...
Unpacking libapt-pkg5.0:amd64 (1.3~rc3) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-1) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_1.3~rc3_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Thanks,

 - Alexander

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt
Source-Version: 1.3~rc4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 836220@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> (supplier of updated apt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 20:26:36 +0200
Source: apt
Binary: apt libapt-pkg5.0 libapt-inst2.0 apt-doc libapt-pkg-dev libapt-pkg-doc apt-utils apt-transport-https
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3~rc4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
Description:
 apt        - commandline package manager
 apt-doc    - documentation for APT
 apt-transport-https - https download transport for APT
 apt-utils  - package management related utility programs
 libapt-inst2.0 - deb package format runtime library
 libapt-pkg-dev - development files for APT's libapt-pkg and libapt-inst
 libapt-pkg-doc - documentation for APT development
 libapt-pkg5.0 - package management runtime library
Closes: 836220
Changes:
 apt (1.3~rc4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Julian Andres Klode ]
   * Fix segfault and out-of-bounds read in Binary fields
   * TagFile: Fix off-by-one errors in comment stripping
   * Base256ToNum: Fix uninitialized value
   * test-apt-cdrom: Fix for gnupg 2.1.15
   * CMake: test/libapt: Use a prebuilt GTest library if available
   * CMake: apt-pkg: Use correct ICONV_INCLUDE_DIRS variable
   * acquire: Use priority queues and a 3 stage pipeline design
     => faster updates with better progress reporting
   * debian: Move bugscript to old location for overlayfs xdev issue
   * debian: Pass -O to make to get readable build logs
 .
   [ David Kalnischkies ]
   * try not to call memcpy with length 0 in hash calculations
   * re-add apt breaks/replaces apt-utils (<< 1.3~exp2~) (Closes: #836220)
   * support long keyid and fingerprint in gpgv's GOODSIG
Checksums-Sha1:
 ba7bb10f079f944ceef0f3634388606525c6fa22 2504 apt_1.3~rc4.dsc
 0f27356747b02ea27cd4777392e9df1f6d39cbac 2041020 apt_1.3~rc4.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 1d8c9675f3fe6c7d36aa06fcb55606a7a4d70897f621948bd6a562f5d0e92359 2504 apt_1.3~rc4.dsc
 5c834057ae82f81580c0cc6bb4d5e90d9aeed24b327a51e84d6724ed49890a69 2041020 apt_1.3~rc4.tar.xz
Files:
 13c826b943bb721e2cbe196c85b0ab84 2504 admin important apt_1.3~rc4.dsc
 5cc63ec79651ab31d2c3248839d62961 2041020 admin important apt_1.3~rc4.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ZuKH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: