[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#87442: marked as done (The ability to downgrade packages to the default release would be nice)



Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:34:25 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1010224173348.7135I-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
and subject line Bug#87442: The ability to downgrade packages to the default release would be nice
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2001 18:16:46 +0000
>From daniel@bootp-202.miller.brown.edu Sat Feb 24 12:16:46 2001
Return-path: <daniel@bootp-202.miller.brown.edu>
Received: from vega.services.brown.edu (vega.brown.edu) [::ffff:128.148.19.202] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14WjFN-000675-00; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:16:45 -0600
Received: from bootp-202.miller.brown.edu (bootp-202.miller.brown.edu [128.148.213.202])
	by vega.brown.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA28010;
	Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:16:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from daniel by bootp-202.miller.brown.edu with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14WjFM-0003ya-00; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:16:44 -0500
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:16:44 -0500
From: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@brown.edu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: The ability to downgrade packages to the default release would be nice
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20010224131644.A13629@torrent>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
Sender: Daniel Burrows <daniel@bootp-202.miller.brown.edu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.0
Severity: wishlist

  I was just testing some packages from experimental and wondered whether it
would be possible to use the Super Cow Powers of the new apt to return to
unstable without manual labor :)  Specifying the versions on a per-package
basis worked, but it would be nice if there were a way (similar to -t) to
force all packages listed on the command-line to be from a particular release.

   Thanks,
  Daniel

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux torrent 2.4.2 #1 Thu Feb 22 07:36:30 EST 2001 i686

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.2.2-1     GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10                1:2.95.2-14 The GNU stdc++ library            

-- 
/----------------- Daniel Burrows <Daniel_Burrows@brown.edu> -----------------\
|               "The problem with LaTeX is that your answers                  |
|                look so good, you think they *must* be right!"               |
|                 -- Thomas Banchoff                                          |
\----------------- The Turtle Moves! -- http://www.lspace.org ----------------/

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 87442-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2001 00:34:33 +0000
>From jgg@debian.org Sat Feb 24 18:34:33 2001
Return-path: <jgg@debian.org>
Received: from ike-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.35] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14Wp8z-0000PP-00; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:34:33 -0600
Received: (qmail 21439 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 00:34:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender <jgg@debian.org>)
          by ike-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <dburrows@brown.edu>; 25 Feb 2001 00:34:31 -0000
Received: from localhost
	([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
	by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 14Wp8w-0002Ly-00; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:34:30 -0700
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:34:25 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com
To: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@brown.edu>, 87442-done@bugs.debian.org
cc: APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#87442: The ability to downgrade packages to the default release would be nice
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20010224131644.A13629@torrent>
Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1010224173348.7135I-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 87442-done@bugs.debian.org


On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Daniel Burrows wrote:

> would be possible to use the Super Cow Powers of the new apt to return to
> unstable without manual labor :)  Specifying the versions on a per-package
> basis worked, but it would be nice if there were a way (similar to -t) to
> force all packages listed on the command-line to be from a particular release.

In general downgrading is not supported/well tested by debian and I don't
really want to encourage mass downgrades. 

Jason



Reply to: