Bug#1050994: xutils-dev: Please add support for loong64
User: debian-loongarch@lists.debian.org
Usertags: loong64
X-Debbugs-Cc:
debian-loongarch@lists.debian.org,zhangjialing@loongson.cn,zhangdandan@loongson.cn
Dear maintainers,
On Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:07:02 +0200 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Source: xutils-dev
> Version: 1:7.7+6.1
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: loong64
> X-Debbugs-Cc:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org,zhangjialing@loongson.cn,zhangdandan@loongson.cn
>
> Hi!
>
> Multiple X packages currently fail to build from source on
loong64 due
> to missing architecture support in xutils-dev [1]:
>
> gcc: warning: LinuxMachineDefines: linker input file unused
because linking not done
> gcc: error: LinuxMachineDefines: linker input file not found:
No such file or directory
>
> This should be fixed in a similar fashion for loong64 as it
has been done for
> riscv64 in [2]. I have CC'ed two engineers from Loongson to
make them aware
> of the bug so they can work on a patch to add loong64
support.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> > [1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xaw3d&arch=loong64&ver=1.5%2BF-1.1&stamp=1693526902&raw=0
> > [2]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026002
>
For loong64, many packages[1] failed to compile and are currently
in the "Build-Attempted" state in the Debian Package Auto-Building
environment.
The error log is related to xutils-dev package.
LoongArch architecture has been supported in the xorg/util/cf
upstream.
The merge-request can be found at
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/util/cf/-/commit/b6ece89e454a94c96e6f4592fe58ac6d534f16f3.
Signed-of-by: WANG Xuerui.
In addition, LoongArch architecture has been added in xutils-dev
(1:7.7+7) version[2].
Would it be possible to update "1:7.7+7 UNRELEASED" to "untable"
in the next upload?
Your opinions are welcome.
[1]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=loong64&suite=sid
[2]:
https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/app/xutils-dev/-/blob/debian-unstable/debian/changelog
Thanks,
Dandan Zhang
Reply to: