On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:19:48PM +0100, Colomban Wendling wrote: > Le 06/03/2024 à 17:31, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 03:46:41PM +0100, Colomban Wendling wrote: > > > Anyway, I'm CCing Steve (who did the unstable NMU) and Samuel in case they > > > have extra clues. > > The only change in the NMU was to rename the libdecoration0 package to > > libdecoration0t64 for the 64-bit time_t transition. Unless this managed to > > break the *contents* of that package (i.e. the library has gone missing), > > this should not have had any effect on the behavior of compiz. > So the package has not been rebuilt with different flags or anything? Not *deliberately* as part of this upload. The only change to flags should be on 32-bit architectures, excluding i386. I have assumed you are not trying to run compiz on one of these archs! But the toolchain also evolves over time, so this could certainly be a misbuild due to underlying changes. > Anyway, I hardly expect this to be an issue, I just wanted to eliminate the > only Compiz-side change that happened in the last months. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature