hi, okay, this is the last post that will go to each of the BR's mentioned above. Future posts should go to debian-x only, along with any individuals who wish to be CC'd (myself included, since i'm not subscribed to debian-x). anyway, i've updated the wiki documentation for the current status of all things compiz: http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/Compiz it's a pretty quick read. basically, the table at the end of the page can be used to track what is still left to be done for re-debianising each of the source packages. what would be best at this point is for folks to step up and take a couple packages from that list, and redo the packaging using only standard debhelper stuff. while the interim packages are stuck up in NEW, you can get copies of the source packages i've uploaded from http://people.debian.org/~seanius/compiz/ if there's anyone who knows python, i could specifically use help with the re-debianization of the compizconfig-python and ccsm source packages. ideally you should be able to satisfy your compiz-related build-dependencies with the interim packages. the rest of the stuff is pretty straightforward, i think. let me know if you have any questions/comments! sean On Thursday 01 November 2007 07:32:57 pm Leo "costela" Antunes wrote: > Daniel Baumann wrote: > > i thought this was about the new packages, well, i think i got > > confused.. sorry. > > I was thinking about the _new_ packages too, just to make our work > easier before handing it over to the pkg-xorg team (and perhaps even > after it). > I agree it doesn't make sense to maintain the old ones. > > If the URL I sent was for the old packages, where are the latest version > of the new ones? (sorry if I missed that somehow) > > BTW, should this discussion still be cross posted to so many bugs/lists? > > Cheers
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.