[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#199838: Re : Bug#199838: xfree86: 4.2.1-9 src fails to build



Daniel,

Thanks, but it does not works here.

---
Regards
	Jean-Luc

On 03-07-2003 13:37, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:35:36PM +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon wrote:
> I have the following error trying to build the source tree :
> ....
> debian/scripts/source.patch
> touch debian/stampdir/source.patch
> touch debian/stampdir/source.build
> debian/scripts/patch.apply
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_post421-2003.02.18.diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_ati_driver.
diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_cyrix_driver.
diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_neomagic_driver.
diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_newport_driver.
diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_nv_driver.
diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_savage_driver.
diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xaw.diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xdm.diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xlib.diff...
done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xman.diff...
done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_xtt.diff...done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/001a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff...
done.
> Applying patch debian/patches/001b_m68k_haslinuxinput_too.diff...
dry
run failed.
> patching file config/cf/linux.cf
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 157.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
config/cf/linux.cf.rej
> make: *** [debian/stampdir/patchapply] Erreur 1
> ....
>
> I run Debian sid with gcc-3.3 on a K6-2 500MHz processor.

export LC_COLLATE=C, before you build.

--
Daniel Stone
<daniel@fooishbar.org>
http://www.kde.org - http://www.debian.org - http://www.xwin.org





Reply to: