[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [jonathan.heaney@btinternet.com: X in Sid +G400 DRI]



Hilko Bengen wrote:

(Answer goes to list as well as to Jonathan)

Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:

Can someone help this person out?

I only have access to 3Dfx and ATI cards, and do not experience this
problem.

--
G. Branden Robinson                |    If you make people think they're
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    thinking, they'll love you; but if
branden@debian.org                 |    you really make them think, they'll
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    hate you.
From: Jonathan Heaney <jonathan.heaney@btinternet.com>
Subject: X in Sid +G400 DRI
To: branden@debian.org
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:39:29 +0100

Branden,

Ref.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200108/msg00035.html

Reponse from you re. a DRI mismatch, I'm having the same issue but the
fix you proposed does not solve the problem.


Is there a solution?  I was not aware of there being any v3 DRI, I
always use Alan Cox's kernels and have tried to compile with the older
DRI but to no avail.


I am running Kernel version 2.4.9 and the current X packages from sid.
Works for me. HAve a look at the kernel changelogs for info on where
the new DRI code went in. The DRI module can also be compiled
separately, it lives on Sourceforge.

-Hilko

Have tried with a recompiled kernel with only agp, no dri, and the dri module (v3.0.2) from sourceforge.

Am still getting the error message:
(EE) MGA(0): [drm] MGADRIScreenInit failed (DRI version = 4.0.0, expected 3.0.x). Disabling DRI.

Even with the 3.0.2 mga.o module...

When X starts I can just catch a line which appears to be telling me something about /dev/dri .... it does not appear in /var/log/XFree86.0.log .... how can I get it to output this to a file I can examine rather than the display?

I'm using the mga/hal drivers from Matrox but I replaced/removed with the Debian ones and still the same problem.

Would appreciate any assistance.

Jonathan



Reply to: