[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#921954: gnulib



Hi,

On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 22:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Simon (and Boyuan),
> 
> Quoting Simon Josefsson (2024-04-13 19:38:06)
> > You may have noticed I adopted gnulib and have made an upload to
> > experimental.  I am happy to have this team maintained, so feel free
> > to
> > join the effort -- I added Boyuan to Uploaders: since you've been
> > doing
> > QA uploads for some time, but happy to add others too.
> > 
> > If you don't object, I will upload to unstable in a couple of days if
> > nothing comes up.  Relevant reading material on the changes I did for
> > this package:
> > 
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnulib/-/blob/debian/sid/debian/README.source
> > https://blog.josefsson.org/2024/04/13/reproducible-and-minimal-source-only-tarballs/
> > 
> > What do you think?  I hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes here. 
> > The
> > package was orphaned and is a critical component to be able to build
> > source-only tarballs for other packages in Debian.
> 
> I am happy that gnulib is in good hands.
> 
> I've moved on to other challenges, and have no interest in working on
> gnulib now.  That said, you are welcome to try nudge me if some
> concrete
> task emerges where you image I might be of help.

Thanks for your work; I am okay with the changes. For git bundle
reproducibility, seeking advice from Debian people in the reproducible-
builds project may be helpful. With the changes in project structure, it
might be useful to provide documents about how to use the updated gnulib
Debian package for other Debian software packagers. 


Thanks,
Boyuan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: