[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#973844: RFA: tar



Janos LENART <ocsi@debian.org> writes:

> I would like to adopt & maintain tar. I am using some of the 'newer'
> features at many sites that the current bugs are about, like remote
> archives, zstd and incremental; also well versed in C. I have been a DD
> since 2000.
>
> Looking at the list of bugs I am thinking most of them should be forwarded
> to upstream. There are some low hanging fruits like #892273, and there are
> good few that will be wontfix like #310323 .
>
> Can I fix for example #892273 and upload a new version, or did you have
> something else in mind?

Sounds fine.  Thanks for your interest!

> Am I assuming correctly that https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tar.git is up
> to date? :-)

Yes.  I added a debian/README.source documenting the repo branch
structure and how to integrate a new upstream release, and pushed to
ensure the salsa repo is up to date.  Please feel free to ask if you
need anything else. 

Bdale

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: