Bug#973872: Usage of MersenneTwister.h in CRAN bipartite (Was:r-cran-bipartite_2.15-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)
Dear Carsten,
thanks a lot for your quick response.
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 07:20:47PM +0100, carsten.dormann@biom.uni-freiburg.de wrote:
> To be honest, I had scanned the licence statement in that file, but not noticed the notice.
>
> The code in bipartite is based on code by Aaron Clauset, who himself used the Mersenne Twister to avoid the relatively short random number period. We (Rouven Strauss and I) did not touch that bit of code at all; our work was solely on the bit produced by Aaron. His code is available publicly here: http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~aaronc/hierarchy/ <http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~aaronc/hierarchy/>
>
> I never wrote to any of the emails listed. It is indeed somewhat awkward and I have no idea what to do about it.
>
> Wikipedia does not square with the notice you found: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_Twister <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_Twister>, calling it "permissively licensed".
>
> Given Debian's merit of being very careful with such licenses, I can only ask you for suggestions: is there anything I can do, you think, to push the Mersenne Twister towards a GPL-like license?
I think the only way is to convince the copyright holders to drop that
paragraph and use one of the known licenses (not necessarily GPL even if
this would probably a nicely fitting choice for your own code).
Kind regards
Andreas.
> > On 7. Nov 2020, at 17:59, Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I intend to package bipartite for Debian since some R package needs
> > it to run its test suite. Our ftpmaster who is checking licensing
> > issues stumbled upon the file src\MersenneTwister.h. It contains
> > an additional clause to the license which says:
> >
> > // The original code included the following notice:
> > //
> > // When you use this, send an email to: matumoto@math.keio.ac.jp
> > // with an appropriate reference to your work.
> > //
> > // It would be nice to CC: rjwagner@writeme.com and Cokus@math.washington.edu
> > // when you write.
> >
> > Would you please clarify how far the "original code" is changed? Its
> > also hard to interpret what the "send an email to" might mean. Should
> > every user who is using the bipartite package send an e-mail to the
> > authors? That's really hard to realise since we can not guarantee that
> > every user will read the copyright statement of all software that is
> > installed. So some clarification what that clause might mean would be
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > ----- Forwarded message from Joerg Jaspert <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> -----
> >
> > Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 23:00:08 +0000
> > From: Joerg Jaspert <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
> > To: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>, Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@alioth-lists.debian.net>
> > Subject: r-cran-bipartite_2.15-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
> >
> >
> > Hi Maintainer,
> >
> > rejected, sorry, but src\MersenneTwister.h is not GPL.
> > Also, how much is that code there based on "the original code"? See
> > the paragraph directly below the license. The requirement there is
> > *NOT* nice for inclusion in Debian.
> >
> > --
> > bye Joerg
> >
> >
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> > concerns.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-pkg-team mailing list
> > R-pkg-team@alioth-lists.debian.net
> > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r-pkg-team
> >
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
>
> — — — — — —
> Carsten Dormann
>
> Professor of Biometry and Environmental System Analysis
> Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources
> University of Freiburg
> Tennenbacher Str. 4
> 79106 Freiburg
>
> Tel.: 0049 (0)761 203-3750
> Fax.: 0049 (0)761 203 3751
> Email: carsten.dormann@biom.uni-freiburg.de
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: