[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801253: bug is marked as fixed in BTS due to fix in upstream, but i still can reproduce it in the most recent version.



Hey,

oh. thanks, i didn't notice that - so I'll report it to upstream/file a bug there.

But an additional question: Why is the bug #698748 still in the category "outstanding bugs" => was it just forgotten to mark as done, or is that expected?

On 02/07/2016 06:06 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi toogley,

toogley wrote:
i want to fix https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698748

According to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698748#10 ,this
bug was fixed by upstream. But he didn't say in which version.

Well, the bug was reported against 1.7.2.4-4, the next upstream
release after that was 1.7.3. And indeed, "git show upstream/1.7.3"
(which shows the diff of the import of that upstream release, i.e. the
diff of 1.7.2.4 against 1.7.3) shows the following hunk:

diff --git a/in/man=wicd.8.in b/in/man=wicd.8.in
index bf63538..686f057 100644
--- a/in/man=wicd.8.in
+++ b/in/man=wicd.8.in
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The daemon is responsible for making and configuring connections, reading and
  writing configuration files and logs, and monitoring the connection status.
  The daemon's job is split between two processes: wicd-daemon.py and monitor.py.
  All the connection status monitoring, as well as the auto-reconnection logic,
-takes place in monitor.py.  Everthing else is done by wicd-daemon.py.
+takes place in monitor.py.  Everything else is done by wicd-daemon.py.

  The user interface (stored in wicd-gtk), which is made up of a tray
  icon, a main GUI window, and its child dialogs, gets configuration and network

But if he had merged the fix into the main branch, i wouldn't find
that typo in my local repo.

And you haven't found it.

$ cd ~/pkg-wicd && git checkout master
$ grep -r 'Everthing'
README:takes place in monitor.py.  Everthing else is done by wicd-daemon.py.

What you found was a second incarnation of the same typo in a
different file. :-)

		Regards, Axel



Reply to: