Re: docs updated, working copy of php draft now available online
On Thursday 04 of August 2005 23:07, you wrote:
> Charles Fry escreveu:
> >As a result, here are my new comments about the PHP Policy Draft:
> >
> > 4.1.2: Instead, this should read "PHP PEAR library packages must not
> > register and unregister themselves in the pear package management
> > system. On the other hand, 'pear install -R DIR package.xml' can
> > [should?] be called from 'debian/rules'."
> >
> >Another implication of this (if I correctly understand Piotr) is that
> >Pear modules should not include any .registry files. Is that correct?
>
> Maybe we can ask if Pear Group can change pear to read more than one
> directory in option "php_dir" .
>
> We can keep registry files , because if we find a way to integrate
> /usr/share/php and /usr/local/share/php..
> these files are very small, and dont represent a big problem :)
Ok. But important is not to modify, create or remove this files manually! The
packages should bring the .register files in archive, not postinst/postrm
scripts. Then they could be verified by `debsums' later.
The default php_dir should be /usr/local/php by default. If not, the user can
destroy the /usr/share/php system directories.
--
.''`. Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' : mailto:Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl
`. `' mailto:dexter@debian.org
`-
Reply to: