Re: Possible draft non-free firmware option with SC change
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 02:16:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> However, I feel strongly that the non-free installer *has* to be
> handled differently. If not, we're choosing to fail on (some of) our
> principles. This is why I'm here with this GR after all.
So do I. Or does proposal A describe a free installer?
>
> --
> Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
> "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that
> English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on
> occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them
> unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary." -- James D. Nicoll
--
Reply to: