Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV Timing

[Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>]

On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 11:48:42AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV Timing"):
> > The reason I didn't reorder it yet, is because it's talked about
> > like that. But I guess I can just reorder it on the page, keep the
> > letter but change the number.
> 
> Yes, please, do that.

So I changed the order to:
F: Choice 1: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distribution cooperation
B: Choice 2: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives
A: Choice 3: Support for multiple init systems is Important
D: Choice 4: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress
E: Choice 5: Support for multiple init systems is Required
G: Choice 6: Support portability and multiple implementations
C: Focus on systemd for init system and other facilities (withdrawn)

Or do you have a better suggestion with the current options?

I'm thinking about renaming F to just "Focus on systemd", to make
it shorter. I'm not sure how devotee is going to like wrapping
long lines.


Kurt