Re: New amdendment proposal (Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private)
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:09:37PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 02:08:34PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > While checking all requisites are met, I found I mis-counted for my
> > CfV, mixing together Iain's original and reformed proposal. It
> > currently has four seconders only, so in order to have the three
> > presented options in the ballot:
> >
> > > ========================================================================
> > >
> > > Title: debian-private shall remain private
> > >
> > > The text of the GR is replaced with the following.
> > >
> > > 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of
> > > debian-private list archives" is repealed.
> > > 2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the
> > > debian-private archives, except in the following circumstances.
> > > 2a. Participants may declassify their own material.
> > > 2b. Participants may declassify the material of others where
> > > consent has explicitly been given by the authors of all of the
> > > material being declassified.
> > > 3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
> > >
> > > ========================================================================
> >
> > Seconded.
>
> Can I say that this is rather annoying from a procedural stand
> point? You already called for a vote.
And unimportant.
Kurt
Reply to: