On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:29:10AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 09:00:43PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > And at the time he was kind of right, [...], so he was > > rejecting the delays on the ???over-administrative-thing??? NM has > > become since he created the concept (at the time it was a > Uh, where'd that myth come from? ... > Since that time it's gotten quite a bit more procedural still (with > question lists, and rules about contributions before applying, and not > passing through without already being an active maintainer, and aiui on > average a much more thorough review of applicants). I think that these changes are a much bigger deal than you're making them out to be here: the current new maintainer process feels very different to how it felt when the DAM/FD/AM based system was first introduced. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature