On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:01:05AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:22:08 +1000, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> said: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Yet another draft. There are major changes in this version, so I > >> think we'll need to have people who seconded re-second the version > >> that comes out of this discussion. > > This has gone for about a week and a half without further comment, > > and has been seconded by: > > Don Armstrong > > martin f krafft > > Anthony Towns > > Adrian von Bidder > > Kalle Kivimaa Anibal > > Monsalve Salazar > > which makes it formal, afaics. Are we right to move to a vote this > > coming Tuesday? > Well, the previous draft had been seconded also by > a) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> > b) Martin Wuertele <maxx@debian.org> > c) Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> > d) "Benj. Mako Hill" <mako@debian.org> > e) Alexander Zangerl <az@snafu.priv.at> > If any of these people have changed their minds, or ratified > the new version, I have missed those mails. Could we get some > clarification from the above, please? (As ti stands, 5 people are > enough to have the old draft be on its own on the ballot, which is > something we do not necessarily want :) I'll accept the judgement of the original proposer of the previous version that the new draft should supersede, and withdraw my sponsorship of the first proposal. I am not sponsoring the second draft at this time, as I haven't taken the time to read it thoroughly yet. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature