Re: GR: Removal of non-free
On Jan 5, 2004, at 07:10, MJ Ray wrote:
Some level of support for this would probably actually improve debian,
especially non-debian packages of software and any hypothetical
distribution of services when we dominate the world. Maybe package
metadata should include info for reportbug-type packages to use.
/usr/share/doc/reportbug/README.developers
(It's already there, and has been for a while)
What else could be useful here? Should clause 1's "non-free" terms be
recast as "non-debian" and pledge support for interoperability?
Interoperability is nice, but doing stuff right is more important. We
already pledge to support our users in SC 4; not sure why we need it in
SC 1 as well.
Reply to: