Andreas Barth wrote on 18/07/2006 22:27: > * Adrian von Bidder (avbidder@fortytwo.ch) [060717 22:26]: > >>Comments? Ok for upload? (FWIW, just upload it if it's ok.) > > For obvious reasons, I think the fix should go via security first / at > the same time as for volatile. Otherwise, seems ok to me. I might be stupid here, but which obvious reasons should keep volatile from doing a security update on a package before the main archive is updated? Sure, it might look a bit strange if it happens that way because it makes the main security team seem a bit on the slow side, but apart from that, I only see good reasons to get such an update into each archive as quickly as possibe. Regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature