[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A case for supporting antiquated hardware, was Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?





On Fri, Jun 2, 2023, 4:49 PM Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> wrote:
On 2/6/23 23:55, James H. H. Lampert wrote:

<snip>

> Luddites of the World Unite! You have nothing to lose but your upgrade
> treadmills

If, by upgrade treadmills, you mean the flatbed treadmills, that have a
belt that is turned by the human walking on it, rather than the electric
ones with electric motors for lazy humans, the ones that have the belt

I'm afraid he meant the treadmill that used to be called "planned obsolescence". The thought that a perfectly satisfactory machine no longer suffices for you because it is "yesterday's model". Thereafter it will stop working with newer machines (or software) which are intended to be incompatible with it.
And what is the end in view?
Sell you a new machine.


that is turned by the human walking on it, having a slight, and,
adjustable upward grade, then, such treadmills should definitely not be
abandoned.

The human powered (rather than electric powered) treadmills are far more
healthy, both directly for the human powering the treadmill, and, for
the environment, especially, given that most electricity is generated
either by burning things, and therefore, creating atmospheric pollution,
and, poisoning most lifeforms, or, by nuclear meltdowns, causing
radioactive poisoning, and, even worse toxic waste, than from burning
things.

So, human powered treadmills, that involve an upward grade, should not
be abandoned, the abandonment of which treadmills, threatens life, for
the sake of ever-increasing laziness.

..
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
(UTC+0800)
..............


Reply to: