Re: drive controller Q?
On 9/15/22 05:18, gene heskett wrote:
On 9/15/22 03:04, David Christensen wrote:
On 9/14/22 20:06, gene heskett wrote:
On 9/14/22 19:50, David Christensen wrote:
On 9/14/22 11:40, gene heskett wrote:
... existing software raid10's 4 Samsung 1T's ...
228G currently used.
I currently have 1 extra 1T Samsung and an empty sata socket ...
Amanda would need 5 drives, cuz it uses a
dedicated holding disk and completes the DLE to it, before moving the
completed DLE
to the vtape.
I now have added 2 rock64's and killed one old Dell with
a lightning strike since.
Lightning strikes getting into residential electrical systems is
extremely dangerous.
You are preaching to the choir. I am a Certified Electronics Technician.
4 @ 1 TB HDD RAID10 seems like overkill for 228 GB of backup data.
I'm just getting re-started. Before the seagate experiment killed
everything, my typical
nightly backup was over 40 Gigs on a 14 day dumpcycle.
... I would buy three mobile racks:
https://www.startech.com/en-us/hdd/drw150satbk
I already have a 4 bay version of that, half full of SSD's now at 2 per
3.5" bay.
Okay. 2 @ 1 TB RAID1 in the server and individual 1 TB drives for
off-site would work for 560 GB.
I put my bare drives in these cases:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B018VKBYWI
I redid the service in 2008, brought it all up to NEC specs, but the
computer and the monitor were
plugged into two different circuits. Jury rigged, fixed now.
Were the two different circuits on the same phase, or opposite phases?
How did plugging the computer and the monitor into two different
circuits affect the outcome of a lightning strike?
David
Reply to: