Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']
On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 12:30:45 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-08-07 12:11 p.m., Brian wrote:
> > On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 10:13:15 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 2021-08-07 10:05 a.m., Brian wrote:
> >>> On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 16:36:19 +0300, ellanios82 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> : https://www.merriam-webster.com/
> >>>
> >>> [Snipped]
> >>>
> >>> The point of your posting appears to be to point out a user's
> >>> spelling mistake. Maybe he is grateful for the uinsolicited
> >>> advice but it is regarded as bad manners on this list. Please
> >>> refrain.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Being irrelevant is considered bad manners in all community. So maybe
> >> you shall police yourself *before* looking to comment on others behavior.
> >>
> >> There's nothing *bad* in this explanation as it's only popular culture
> >> explained. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing hidden and no *angry mob*
> >> except maybe you that has the a limited tolerance. Don't worry, autistic
> >> type of person are loved on this list. We accept that for you it may be
> >> hard to understand all the magnitude behind act of language.
> >
> > So, so interesting: Don't address the actual point made but go for
> > the person. Having diagnosed my condition, can one expect more
> > condiderate and sympathetic treatment in the future?
> >
> Indeed yes, you'll get appropriate treatment for your condition.
> I first suggest you read the book "Psychiatric Slavery" authored by
> Thomas Szasz. I think this will be a good start on a new road.
A nice side-step to avoid an a direct response to the question. I am
glad you are not a practising doctor. Diagnosing a broken leg and
advising someone to read a book on anatomy seems to be your style.
--
Brian.
Reply to: