Re: [OT] Regular DKIM issues on this ML (was: Re: why !oh why Debian and application list)
On Tue 16 Jun 2020 at 21:28:11 (+0200), l0f4r0@tuta.io wrote:
> 16 juin 2020 16:30 de deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk:
>
> > It might be easier for people to follow the substance of this thread
> > if you posted in such a way as to include one simple self-descriptive
> > test in each post, and not include all the deeply-nested "noise" like
> > the above. So, for example, you could write:
> >
> > >From foo. This line was written with a leading unescaped From, "From ".
> >
> > >From bar. This line was written with a leading escaped From, ">From ".
> >
> > You could, in addition, include a file attachment of the test as written.
> >
> Good suggestion.
>
> > You might also wish to omit/change your Attribution line temporarily,
> > because it prevents your tests from ever consisting entirely of 7-bit
> > ASCII, owing to its "à".
> >
> What's the consequence of it please?
AFAICT from the header, you encode these emails (quoted-printable).
I thought that might be avoided if entirely 7-bit ASCII, but I think
you frequently use other non-ASCII, like funny spaces, as well as à,
which also cause encoding to be necessary. And it's possible that
your sending encoded emails is obligatory (or set to be).
> > These little things might help clarify your reports of the distorting
> > effects of a medium, when those reports are subject to the same
> > potential distortion.
> >
> Yes, it's not always easy to communicate efficiently & clearly by email ;)
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: