Re: Netscape 6 for Linux?
» D-Man said this and I say that:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:46:29AM -0200, hzi wrote:
> | Hi-
> |
> | I read somewhere (actually, a Brazilian Linux magazine) that
> Netscape 6 demands 32.5Mb with just *one* page open!
> | Pure bloatware. To be avoided.
> |
>
> I don't know about this, but I am using Netscape 6 on my Win2k box at
> work right now. It looks nice. Hasn't crashed yet. Doesn't seem to
> use more memory or cpu than I expected. Is a bit slow sometimes.
>
> I like the new "modern" theme it comes with.
I didn't try it yet but if it has some problems it wouldn't be
a surprise. It's netscape...
> | Henry L.
> |
> | ps: yes, this is from Outlook. Migrated from RH to Debian, and uh,
> RH was easier...
RH is a nightmare. Debian is a dream... Some people get used
to the nightmare, and in the next night, when they go for the dream,
they think it is the nightmare...
> Have you ever tried mutt? IMO it is the best MUA currently available.
> Ok, so it is curses based, no gui, but it works well through a
> telnet/ssh session and has excellent list support.
The best working combination (which I use) is mutt +
procmail. Works pretty fine.
--
[]'s,
francisco m. neto
"Toke au kokoro ga, watashi o kowasu"
-- Ayanami Rei
Reply to: