Re: SVN tetex commit: r132 - in tetex-base/trunk/debian: . patches
- To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: SVN tetex commit: r132 - in tetex-base/trunk/debian: . patches
- From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:39:29 +0200
- Message-id: <20050912073929.GA2676@preusse>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <E1E52zm-0000QO-74@costa.debian.org>
- References: <E1E4zjr-0006eE-Mm@costa.debian.org> <E1E52zm-0000QO-74@costa.debian.org>
On 16.08.05 Frank Küster (frank@costa.debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
> Author: frank
> Date: 2005-08-16 15:04:53 +0000 (Tue, 16 Aug 2005)
> New Revision: 132
>
> Modified:
> tetex-base/trunk/debian/control
> tetex-base/trunk/debian/patches/patch-deb
> tetex-base/trunk/debian/patches/patch-deb.old
> tetex-base/trunk/debian/rules
> tetex-base/trunk/debian/rules.in
> Log:
> - [control] Build-depend on tex-common again, we don't need it for
> common.*, that's right, but we do need it for dsf-patch.mk
>
And I assume the only reason, why tetex-base still has a BD on
tex-common is because it does not yet use quilt. If I have time I'll
have a look at that...
H.
--
An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you
really care to know.
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Reply to: