Bug#246027: marked as done (tetex-bin: fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:40:23 +0200
with message-id <20040618064023.GB1370@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Bug#246027: tetex-bin: fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2004 21:08:54 +0000
>From gyde@helium.kri.dk Mon Apr 26 14:08:54 2004
Return-path: <gyde@helium.kri.dk>
Received: from helium.kri.dk [194.255.56.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BIDLR-0003Kd-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:08:53 -0700
Received: by helium.kri.dk (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 576875787C; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:08:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:08:44 +0200
From: Gyde <gyde@gyde.dk>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-bin: fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Message-ID: <20040426210844.GD3258@helium.kri.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-13
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I had tetex-bin installed. Then I where doing apt upgrades. The tetex-bin=
didn't
work and I remove it and install it ones more. Now when I install tetex-b=
in I
get these faults:
<SNIP>
> apt-get install tetex-bin
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
tetex-bin
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/3903kB of archives.
After unpacking 8839kB of additional disk space will be used.
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-bin.
(Reading database ... 41565 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-13_i386.deb) ...
Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-13) ...
Regenerating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
Error: `tex -ini -jobname=3Dlatex -progname=3Dlatex latex.ini' failed
Error: `etex -ini -jobname=3Delatex -progname=3Delatex *elatex.ini' fail=
ed
Error: `pdftex -ini -jobname=3Dpdflatex -progname=3Dpdflatex pdflatex.in=
i' failed
Error: `pdfetex -ini -jobname=3Dpdfelatex -progname=3Dpdfelatex *pdfelat=
ex.ini' failed
Error: `omega -ini -jobname=3Dlambda -progname=3Dlambda lambda.ini' fail=
ed
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/omega.oft installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/cont-en.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mptopdf.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/metafun.mem installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mpost.mem installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
#########################################################################=
######
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
#########################################################################=
######
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`tex -ini -jobname=3Dlatex -progname=3Dlatex latex.ini' failed
`etex -ini -jobname=3Delatex -progname=3Delatex *elatex.ini' failed
`pdftex -ini -jobname=3Dpdflatex -progname=3Dpdflatex pdflatex.ini' faile=
d
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=3Dpdfelatex -progname=3Dpdfelatex *pdfelatex.ini' =
failed
`omega -ini -jobname=3Dlambda -progname=3Dlambda lambda.ini' failed
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
</SNIP>
All the logfiles contain this:
<SNIP>
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
! You are attempting to make a LaTeX format from a source file
! That is more than one year old.
!
! If you enter <return> to scroll past this message then the format
! will be built, but please consider obtaining newer source files
! before continuing to build LaTeX.
!
! LaTeX is re-issued every 6 months, in June and December.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
</SNIP>
and this:
<SNIP>
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!! Patch file `ltpatch.ltx' (for version <2001/06/01>)
!! is not suitable for version <1999/12/01> of LaTeX.
!! Please check if initex found an old patch file:
!! --- if so, rename it or delete it, and redo the
!! initex run.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
</SNIP>
On 26-04-04 20:52, Frank K=FCster wrote:
> Would you be so kind and use reportbug
>
> reportbug -b tetex-bin -s "tetex-bin: fmtutil: Error! Not all formats h=
ave been built successfully."
>
> so that we get all relevant version and configuration information?
Sure I will, this is new to me.
> > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> Also, it would be good if you could find out which package is it that
> has been kept back.
The following packages have been kept back:
latex2html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.24 Debian configuration managem=
ent sy
ii debianutils 2.8.1 Miscellaneous utilities spec=
ific t
ii dpkg 1.10.21 Package maintenance system f=
or Deb
ii ed 0.2-20 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared librar=
ies an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-6 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0-7 Inter-Client Exchange librar=
y
ii libkpathsea3 2.0.2-13 path search library for teTe=
X (run
ii libpaper1 1.1.14 Library for handling paper c=
haract
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-5 PNG library - runtime
ii libsm6 4.3.0-7 X Window System Session Mana=
gement
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library=
v3
ii libt1-5 5.0.2-2 Type 1 font rasterizer libra=
ry - r
ii libwww-ssl0 [libwww0] 5.4.0-9 The W3C-WWW library (SSL sup=
port)
ii libx11-6 4.3.0-7 X Window System protocol cli=
ent li
ii libxaw7 4.3.0-7 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 4.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneou=
s exte
ii libxmu6 4.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneou=
s util
ii libxt6 4.3.0-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii mime-support 3.26-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'm=
ailcap
ii perl 5.8.3-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extra=
ction
ii sed 4.0.9-3 The GNU sed stream editor
ii tetex-base 2.0.2-7 Basic library files of teTeX
ii ucf 1.05 Update Configuration File: p=
reserv
ii xlibs 4.3.0-7 X Window System client libra=
ries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtim=
e
-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/hyphen: german[=3Daustrian-alte_Rechtschreibung], ngerman[=3D=
naustrian-neue_Rechtschreibung], danish, french[=3Dpatois]
tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
* tetex-bin/upd_map: true
* tetex-bin/cnf_name:
* tetex-bin/fmtutil: true
* tetex-bin/use_debconf: true
* tetex-bin/groupname: users
* tetex-bin/userperm: true
* tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true
* tetex-bin/texmf: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 246027-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 06:41:39 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Thu Jun 17 23:41:39 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BbD4F-0007iZ-00; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:41:39 -0700
Received: from [145.254.198.3] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #26)
id 1BbD3e-0007bn-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:41:08 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E548CAE90; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:40:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:40:23 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: Gyde <gyde@gyde.dk>, 246027-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#246027: tetex-bin: fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Message-ID: <20040618064023.GB1370@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <[🔎] 20040618060748.GS4051@helium.kri.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040618060748.GS4051@helium.kri.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 08:23:08 up 7 min, 1 user, load average: 2.07, 1.12, 0.49
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.26 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 11 packets (191.26 stats units) [2.87 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 246027-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On 18.06.04 Gyde (gyde@gyde.dk) wrote:
> On 27.04.04 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
Hi,
> > Did that fix your problem? Could you configure your package now?
> > Can we close that bug?
>
> Ohhh sorry, yes I did fix my problem and you can close this bug.
>
Thanks fore response! Closing now.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: