Re: teTeX and sarge-release
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: Re: teTeX and sarge-release
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:42:12 +0100
> Well, this statement is not true, as both packages check first for
> the existence of /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap before calling them.
> Nevertheless we should submit a bug and tell them, that the mechanism
> for merging their map-files into ps2pk.map, pdftex.map etc. has
> changed.
Thanks for your detailed investigation. At present,
I plan to upload new tetex-bin with fixes of shlibs
handling in rules, of language.dat handling in postinst
and of Build-Depends on t1lib. (all done in CVS)
Also I noticed that I should have run "debconf-updatepo"
which I forgot by mistake. This is one more TODO, I think.
I'm not sure whether we reached any consensus or not but
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: Re: teTeX and sarge-release
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:51:08 +0100
> 1. We call updmap in out postinst scripts with the option
> --outputdir /etc/texmf/dvips
> We should document that in the Readme.Debian, so we can refer to it,
> when we submit bugs to related packages. I know, that might change
> due to #213310.
if we proceed in this direction I'm very glad if someone
provided comments in README.Debian
I think fixes of shlibs handling and language.dat handling
are very important so I wish to upload new package even with
the current CVS soon.
I welcome any comments.
Regards, 2004-1-28(Wed)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: