On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:02:41PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > I'd like to see the patch, at least. I'm working on it. It turns out that libpaper does not currently provide information at a high enough resolution for TeX's purposes, so it might take a little bit. > Especially I'd like to know; > > - which is of higher priority, pdftex.cfg and papaersize? I would say that pdftex.cfg should be of higher priority: if it's set at all in pdftex.cfg, that should override papersize. In the default pdftex.cfg, you would have commented out entries, with comments describing the situation. > - I'm afraid that a set of choices of papersize and a set > of effective values of pdftex.cfg might be not the same. > How to do if my guess is correct? I'm not sure I understand the question? pdftex.cfg just wants a height and width, not a symbolic name. Peace, Dylan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature