[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#189343: tetex-doc: poor Description:



From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: Bug#189343: tetex-doc: poor Description:
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:20:49 +0200

> >  executable programs belonging to teTeX, i.e. the (La)TeX compiler
>    ^^^^^^^^^^
> >  itself, and variants like pdf(La)TeX, e-TeX etc.
> > 
> Maybe we can kick that out, as a program *is* executable.

> >  and xdvi, and some tools for maintaining your teTeX system. Also
> 
> xdvi, conversion tools and some tools for maintaining your teTeX

> >  Whenever you wondered, why there is a big emptiness below
> >  /usr/share/doc/texmf/, install this package.
> > 
> I agree with Stefan, that this last sentence should be taken out.

> >  and some decorative fonts. Furthermore, there's support files for
> >  BibTeX, Omega, PSTricks, pdfTeX, LaTeX etc.
> >  .
> Furthermore, there are additional support files for BibTeX, Omega,
> PSTricks, pdfTeX, LaTeX etc.

I see.

From: Stefan Ulrich <stefan-ulrich.nntp@zen.co.uk>
Subject: Bug#189343: tetex-doc: poor Description:
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 22:53:37 +0100

> >  This package contains all the documentation of (La)TeX-packages,
> >  which are contained in tetex-base and tetex-extra.
> 
> <fussy mode>
> In English, relative clauses aren't introduced by commas, so
> change that to:
> ... documentation of (La)TeX-packages which are contained ...

Thanks for your advises.  I will modify these in
the next upload.

Regards,		2003-8-22(Fri)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima



Reply to: