Bug#97651: marked as done (language.dat refers to obsolete package.)
Your message dated Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:36:09 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20021211.173609.85404513.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line fixed or normal behavior of conffile
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2001 07:45:26 +0000
>From bastiaan@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no Wed May 16 02:45:26 2001
Return-path: <bastiaan@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no>
Received: from mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no [129.241.62.215]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14zvzp-0001z8-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 02:45:25 -0500
Received: by mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no
via sendmail from stdin
id <m14zvzo-000SloC@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no> (Debian Smail3.2.0.111)
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <m14zvzo-000SloC@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no>
From: Bastiaan Niels Veelo <bastiaan@mimm215.maskin.ntnu.no>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: language.dat refers to obsolete package.
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:45:23 +0200
Bcc:
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-7
Severity: minor
/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat refers to obsolete
tetex-nonfree with the following message:
%% Beware: DEBIAN users have to install tetex-nonfree to use dutch and
%% nehyph2.tex
This line should read
%dutch nehyph.tex
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mimm215 2.2.17 #1 Sat Sep 9 12:42:22 EST 2000 i686
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg 1.8.3.1 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii perl-base [perl5-base] 5.6.0-21 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
ii texinfo 4.0-5 Documentation system for on-line i
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 97651-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2002 08:36:15 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Wed Dec 11 02:36:14 2002
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.140] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18M2Lm-0004PV-00; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 02:36:14 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
by civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18M2Lk-0002Ow-00
for <97651-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:36:12 +0900
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:36:09 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20021211.173609.85404513.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: 97651-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed or normal behavior of conffile
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 97651-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
This was already fixed and the problem was that a user
didn't replace the conffile at upgrading.
Thanks, 2002/12/11
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: