Bug#78640: marked as done (tetex fails to configure: missing texmf.cnf)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Dec 2002 23:32:39 -0500
with message-id <E18LFax-0007Xa-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#78640: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2000 01:14:44 +0000
>From barker@ucsd.edu Sat Dec 02 19:14:44 2000
Return-path: <barker@ucsd.edu>
Received: from dt062n60.san.rr.com (localhost) [204.210.38.96]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 142Njo-0001O0-00; Sat, 02 Dec 2000 19:14:44 -0600
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9F1411098B; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:14:28 -0800
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex fails to configure: missing texmf.cnf
Message-ID: <20001202171428.A15542@ling.ucsd.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: barker@ucsd.edu (Chris Barker)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20000807-5
Something is definitely going wrong with the installation of the tetex
packages. Details:
pogonip:~# apt-get install tetex-bin
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
tetex-base tetex-lib
The following NEW packages will be installed:
tetex-base tetex-bin tetex-lib
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 127 not
upgraded.
Need to get 16.2MB of archives. After unpacking 47.3MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main tetex-base
1.0.2+20000804-3 [13.3M
B]
Get:2 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main tetex-bin
1.0.7+20000807-5 [2873kB]
Get:3 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main tetex-lib
1.0.7+20000807-5 [33.6kB]
Fetched 16.2MB in 8m15s (32.6kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
(Reading database ... 29689 files and directories currently
installed.)
Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-3_all.deb)
...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-lib.
Unpacking tetex-lib (from .../tetex-lib_1.0.7+20000807-5_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-bin.
Unpacking tetex-bin (from .../tetex-bin_1.0.7+20000807-5_i386.deb) ...
Setting up tetex-base (1.0.2+20000804-3) ...
Setting up tetex-lib (1.0.7+20000807-5) ...
Setting up tetex-bin (1.0.7+20000807-5) ...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
/usr/bin/texconfig: No $TEXMFMAIN in texmf.cnf file.
/usr/bin/texconfig: set TEXMFCNF variable to the directory where
teTeX's texmf.cnf file is in.
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
pogonip:~# uname -a
Linux pogonip 2.2.17 #1 Thu Sep 7 13:09:26 EDT 2000 i586 unknown
pogonip:~# pogonip:~# ls -l /lib/libc.so.6
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Nov 11 19:50 /lib/libc.so.6
-> libc-2.2.so
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 78640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2002 04:38:24 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sun Dec 08 22:38:24 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18LFgV-0004Sp-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 22:38:24 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 18LFax-0007Xa-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 23:32:39 -0500
From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
To: 78640-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.28 $
Subject: Bug#78640: fixed in tetex-base 1.0.2+20021025-3
Message-Id: <E18LFax-0007Xa-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 23:32:39 -0500
Delivered-To: 78640-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3.diff.gz
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3.dsc
tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 78640@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 08:05:11 +0900
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - basic teTeX library files
tetex-doc - teTeX documentation
tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
Closes: 51586 78640 127893 133589 139085 153891 156406 169902 170102 170592 171196 171913
Changes:
tetex-base (1.0.2+20021025-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Changed Conflicts: revtex4 (<= 4.0-2) as the revtex4 maintainer,
Alexei Kaminski, kindly made a dummy revtex4 4.0-3 for smooth upgrade.
I would like to express the greatest thanks to Alexei Kaminski!
(Closes: #169902)
* Now provided xdvi.cfg [kohda] (Closes: #171196, #171913)
* Fixed config.ps with patch-tmp. Now dvips was in secure mode by default
and '-R' option should work fine. This will be fixed in the upstream
soon, so we should remove this modification at that instance! [kohda]
(Closes: #51586, #127893, #133589, #139085, #156406)
* Removed tetex-extra.preinst and preinst completely. [advised by jdg and
done by kohda] (Closes: #170592)
- I believe this would fix the failure of installation
(Closes: #78640, #153891, #170102)
* Removed listings.*, this package might be not DFSG-free. [kohda]
Files:
3dd1dc5cefa0daab4cc85d708e6a669a 807 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3.dsc
539a5834663c6d1633486cb4c53b9037 35831 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3.diff.gz
749eefa579d4263eb6460af12a1d5492 17695460 tex optional tetex-base_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
e3e4ac66bf5782d63a5c6ce617256f6b 10301232 tex optional tetex-extra_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
edff402392eec4447612560c27d44f50 21100222 tex optional tetex-doc_1.0.2+20021025-3_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE99AVF1IXdL1v6kOwRAlAgAJwNcWfGVEtKp9ZD00wml668Li0Y9wCbBHDo
/vMezdXxJV+5DMYk/HwxVeE=
=vUvQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: