Bug#78136: marked as done (tetex-base: Won't overwrite csaccent.mf)
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2001 07:40:43 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105260734330.13960-100000@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
and subject line tetex-base in unstable does already conflict with these packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2000 17:00:31 +0000
>From kstar@sri.net Mon Nov 27 11:00:30 2000
Return-path: <kstar@sri.net>
Received: from mailhost.sri.net (staging.sri.net) [166.84.185.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 140Rdm-0005qU-00; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 11:00:30 -0600
Received: from ho-tai.sri.net (dsl.sri.net [166.84.144.77])
by staging.sri.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA28824;
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:00:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from kstar@localhost)
by ho-tai.sri.net (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) id eARH01x24181;
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:00:01 -0500
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 12:00:01 -0500
Message-Id: <200011271700.eARH01x24181@ho-tai.sri.net>
From: kstar@sri.net
Subject: tetex-base: Won't overwrite csaccent.mf
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Reply-To: kstar@sri.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0.2+20000804-2
Severity: important
Preparing to replace tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-2 (using .../tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-3_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement tetex-base ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/public/cs/csaccent.mf', which is also in package cstexfonts
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-base_1.0.2+20000804-3_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux ho-tai 2.2.17 #1 Mon Nov 13 20:50:20 EST 2000 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg 1.7.2 Package maintenance system for Debian
ii perl-5.005-bas 5.005.03-7.1 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5-base)
--- Ignoring modified conffile /etc/texmf/dvips/pdftex.map (>8k)
--- Ignoring modified conffile /etc/texmf/dvips/psfonts.map (>8k)
--- Begin /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap (modified conffile)
#!/bin/sh
extra_modules="
tipa.map
"
lw35=urw-kb # URW fonts (download type1 files using Berry names)
type1_default=false
common_modules="
charter.map context.map lucidabr.map marvosym.map mathpi.map
mathpple-ext.map mt-yy.map mt-plus.map omega.map utopia.map
xypic.map $extra_modules
"
mf_modules="
bsr.map bsr-interpolated.map cmcyr.map cs.map hoekwater.map pl.map
"
lw35_modules="
*-adobe-bi.map
$common_modules
"
if test "x$type1_default" = xtrue; then
lw35_modules="$lw35_modules $mf_modules"
fi
ps2pk_modules="
*-$lw35.map
"
pdftex_modules="
$mf_modules
*ar-ext-$lw35.map
*ar-std-adobe-bi.map
*lw35extra-$lw35.map
mtsupp-ext-$lw35.map
mtsupp-std-adobe-bi.map
$common_modules
"
for file in psfonts.map ps2pk.map pdftex.map; do
cat >$file <<eof
% $file: maintained by the script updmap in \$TEXMFMAIN/dvips/config.
% The preferred way to add things to this file is to put the extra lines
% into a separate file and add that filename to the updmap script. Then,
% run the updmap script to recreate this file.
eof
done
cat $lw35_modules | grep -v '^%' | grep . | sort | uniq >> psfonts.map
cat $ps2pk_modules | grep -v '^%' | grep . | sort | uniq >> ps2pk.map
cat $pdftex_modules | grep -v '^%' | grep . | sort | uniq >> pdftex.map
--- End /etc/texmf/dvips/updmap
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 78136-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2001 05:41:08 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Sat May 26 00:41:08 2001
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 153Wp2-0000SC-00; Sat, 26 May 2001 00:41:08 -0500
Received: (qmail 2523 invoked from network); 26 May 2001 05:41:07 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 26 May 2001 05:41:07 -0000
Received: from bunk (helo=localhost)
by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 153Woh-0003fI-00; Sat, 26 May 2001 07:40:47 +0200
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 07:40:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-X-Sender: <bunk@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
To: <78136-done@bugs.debian.org>, <81758-done@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-base in unstable does already conflict with these packages
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105260734330.13960-100000@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 78136-done@bugs.debian.org
tetex-base in unstable does already conflict with csplain, cslatex and
cstexfonts.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
Reply to: