Re: Please test new tetex packages for woody
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Subject: Re: Please test new tetex packages for woody
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:24:46 +0200 (CEST)
The followings are NOT complaints but only requests or questions.
> I have added the following section in the copyright file (please correct
> any mistakes):
>
> seminar and koma-script have changed their licence recently but there
> are still files that refer to the old copyright. Both are copyrighted
> under the LPPL (LaTeX Project Public License) now. You can find the LPPL
> in /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/lppl.txt.gz
It might be better to add file name explicitly like;
Please see /usr/share/texmf/doc/latex/koma-script/README and
/usr/share/texmf/doc/latex/seminar/sem-read.me.gz
And only one more point. koma-script, seminar and stmaryrd
seem to be put in tetex-base. I think it is much safer to do
in this way but also I think these might be appropriate to be
put in tetex-extra. How do you think?
And generally is there any guideline on this?
Best Regards, 2000.6.30
--
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: