Bug#62541: marked as done (Is it really required to check for old tex packages still?)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jun 2000 08:52:20 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006180850460.12602-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
and subject line These bugs are fixed in tetex-base (1.0.2-1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2000 12:19:35 +0000
Received: (qmail 27872 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2000 12:19:30 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (root@158.49.8.2)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2000 12:19:30 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
by pizarro.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA12143
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:19:18 +0200
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105])
by guadiana.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA01383
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:19:17 +0200
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:18:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Debian Bugs <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Is it really required to check for old tex packages still?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000417140520.10330E-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Debbugs-CC: sanvila@unex.es
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: tetex-bin
Severity: wishlist
I don't think it is needed to check for old tex packages anymore.
It slows down the install without real need.
I think the great amount of time that could be saved on the thousand of
current systems already using tetex compensate for the little
inconvenience of people still using Debian 1.2 (rex) who would have to
remove the tex packages by hand.
In other words: I don't think people will skip Debian 1.3, Debian 2.0
and Debian 2.1 to upgrade directly from Debian 1.2 to Debian 2.2.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 62541-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2000 06:52:23 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Sun Jun 18 01:52:23 2000
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.176.79]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 133YwQ-0001ex-00; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 01:52:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 13136 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2000 06:52:20 -0000
Received: from neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.23)
by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 18 Jun 2000 06:52:20 -0000
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 08:52:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-Sender: bunk@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de
To: 56993-done@bugs.debian.org, 57493-done@bugs.debian.org,
62541-done@bugs.debian.org, 63331-done@bugs.debian.org,
63912-done@bugs.debian.org, 63930-done@bugs.debian.org,
65111-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: These bugs are fixed in tetex-base (1.0.2-1)
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006180850460.12602-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 62541-done@bugs.debian.org
These bugs are fixed in tetex-base (1.0.2-1) that is already in woody.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
Reply to: