Testing removal summary 2008-04-27 (Sunday)
The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:
REMOVED: darcs-monitor 0.3.2-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 20080426
Bug #470375: darcs-monitor: FTBFS: Couldn't match expected type against inferred type
REMOVED: doc++ 3.4.10-3.5
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: domesday 0.3-1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: evolution-python 0.0.4-2
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: fujiplay 1.33-6
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: hello-dbs 1.3-4
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: howl-xml 0.1.0-1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: ipw3945d 1.7.22-5
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: jabber-yahoo 2.3.2-1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: kvirc2 2.1.3-6
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: liblingoteach 0.2.3+cvs20050512-2
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: lingoteach-ui 0.3.99+cvs20060228-1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: manpages-fr 2.79.2-1
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 20080426
Bug #470349: manpages-fr-extra: FTBFS: po4a fails
REMOVED: manpages-ko 20050219-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 20080426
Bug #471615: manpages-ko: FTBFS: manconv: iconv: Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character
REMOVED: mcvs 1.0.13-17.1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: mtd 20061007-1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: njam 1.25-4
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 20080426
Bug #452313: njam should not overwrite high scores on upgrade
REMOVED: o3read 0.0.4-1
Package not in unstable
REMOVED: op-panel 0.27.dfsg-2
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
# 20080426
Bug #472658: op-panel contains undistributable file
REMOVED: penggy 0.2.1-17
Package not in unstable
The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:
HINTED FOR REMOVAL: caudium 2:1.4.9.1-3
<http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/he>
Bug #459931: caudium -- uninstallable on sid
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
--
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Reply to: