Re: [SUMMARY] Divergance with LSB spec

[Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>]

Mark Johnson <mark@phy.duke.edu> writes:

> BTW, I still need your feedback on the following:

Sorry, I missed this before.

> If customization packages that come with both dtd and stylesheet
> layers sit in a top-level directory (under docbook) the spec says:
> 
>   /usr/share/sgml/docbook/kde-customization-0.1/
>   
> But we would want to version the subdirectory, not the top-level one:
>   /usr/share/sgml/docbook/kde-customization/
>                                             0.1/									
>                                             0.2/
> One obstacle here seems to be consistency: 
>  the dtd/ stylesheet/ structure vs. everything goes in a directory called
>  "package-name"
> 
> 
> A reasonable compromise would be to
> 
> A. use
> 
>         /usr/share/sgml/docbook/dtd  
>    and 
>         /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet
> 
>    for the main docbook dtds and stylesheets, and
> 
> B.  put all customization-based packages at the top, under
>     /usr/share/sgml/docbook/, like this:
> 
>     /usr/share/sgml/docbook/simple/
>                                   4.1.2.1/ (upstream files, as shipped)
>                                   4.1.2.4/ (upstream files, as shipped)
> 
>     And don't worry about the xml/sgml distinction - in the long haul
>     everything will become xml anyway.
> 
> Would make packaging very easy... 
> 
> Agree? 

Seems fine to me.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>