On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:02:59PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote: > Alle 13:02, giovedì 14 novembre 2002, Lionel Elie Mamane ha scritto: >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Iñaki Martínez wrote: >> While using a free OS is always better, you can use any other IPSEC >> implementation, they should interoperate. This being said, some / >> many IPSEC implementations support only the slow 3DES (and the >> insecure DES), so using freeswan (with modular extension patches, >> package kernel-patch-freeswan-ext) at both sides can give you a >> significant CPU power usage gain, by using Rijndael (the AES), >> Blowfish or such. > kernel-patch-freeswan-ext UNSTABLE package or kernel-patch-freeswan STABLE > package? This package exists only in unstable. -- Lionel
Attachment:
pgpyUcTEc5zPV.pgp
Description: PGP signature