[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fpLLL upload



On 16/03/2013 18:01, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 16/03/2013 17:12, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
>> On 16/03/2013 13:16, Julien Puydt wrote:
>>> Le 16/03/2013 13:11, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
>>>> Am 16.03.2013 12:55, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
>>>>> I share your opinion. I prefer when packages are using shared
>>>>> libraries. Therefor, when a changed is done on the library, the other
>>>>> packages using it immediately get the changes.
>>>>> Otherwise, they have to be rebuilt...
>>>>
>>>> We should not use them, that's clear. The question is if we should
>>>> provide them in case someone wants to link his personal program
>>>> statically without building the library himself.
>> [...]
>>
>>> So, to ship or not to ship static libraries? That is the question...
>> In my opinion, if it helps a user and it is easy to produce, don't
>> hesitate...
> 
> Well, it's committed to git and waiting for an upload ; that's what
> started this thread ;-)
Uploaded.

Merci pour ton travail,
Sylvestre



Reply to: