On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >>>Next thing on my list is rack, which also needs a new version. > > > >Do you have an opinion on rack as well? > > > >Currently, actionpack 3.2 wants ~> 1.4.5, but > > actionpack 4.0 wants ~> 1.5.2. > > My honest opinion? Drop work on actionpack 3.2 (and Rails 3.2, and > Ruby 1.8.7). :-) > > But given that sid has ruby1.8 and ruby1.9.1, and you appear to be > doing the early work towards rails 4.0 (excellent!), why not make > both ruby-rack1.5 and ruby-rack1.6 available? Having multiple versions of anything is a pain, and I think we should making that problem even bigger. ruby1.8 is going to be dropped for jessie. Maybe we will also drop rails 3.2, but since rails 4 is not ready yet we need to keep one rails working. :-) -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature