Bug#961654: buster-pu: package bzip2/1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

Hi Santiago,

On 15/09/2022 09:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/09/2022 15:42, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> > El 14/09/22 a las 13:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió:
> > > On 13/09/2022 16:46, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > IIUC this is about fixing 2 non-security bugs, that were introduced
> > > > prior to buster's initial release.
> > > >
> > > > I personally don't think this fits the LTS project scope.
> > > > Maybe other LTS members will have a different opinion.
> > >
> > > We've had bugfix updates from time to time. They are rare, but not
> > > forbidden. This should go in a buster suite rather than buster-security, but
> > > since there's no such suite for LTS, having it in buster-security is the
> > > lesser evil. Of course we shouldn't flood -security with bug fixes, if that
> > > was necessary we should consider keeping $stable open and handled by the LTS
> > > team (but that doesn't seem necessary at this point).
> > >
> > > In this case, since the update has been prepared and looks sensible, I'll go
> > > ahead with the upload if nobody objects.
> >
> > Thanks, Emilio. Also consider
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961654#15
> >
> > Haven't tested yet myself. But I suppose I should apply it in unstable.
>
> For buster I'd rather use what was proposed for buster-pu, as that's also what 
> is in bullseye.

I have uploaded that, with a s/buster/&-security/ in d/changelog, and fixing 
your name to be UTF-8.

Cheers,
Emilio