[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1010754: marked as done (unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3)

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2022 22:15:33 +0200
with message-id <d441398c-6b82-cec9-76a5-4666c045d2d8@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1010754: unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010754,
regarding unblock: spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7 and unblock: spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1010754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010754
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package spyder and spyder-unittest

(If this isn't the correct Usertags to use, please forgive me - I
couldn't figure out a better one.)

[ Reason ]

The binary packages of spyder (spyder, python3-spyder and
spyder-common) are all "Architecture: all".  However, the 5.x versions
of spyder (the previous one in stable was 4.x) now depend on
python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine, which is only available on six
architectures.  For this reason, spyder's autopkgtest has seen a
regression on ppc64el and s390x as the package is no longer
installable on those architectures.

spyder-unittest depends on spyder, and so has exactly the same issue.
And when spyder-notebook and spyder-terminal are ready, they will face
the same as well, in spite of being Architecture: all.

I don't know how to handle this situation - can the package be allowed
to migrate to testing and only appear in the Packages file for those
architectures on which python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine is available?  If
not, what should I do?

[ Impact ]

Spyder is a popular package and it would be very sad if it were not in
Debian in the future.

[ Tests ]

A large unit test suite.

[ Checklist ]

The checklist points do not seem to be relevant at this stage in the
release cycle


unblock spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7
unblock spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Julian,

On 09-05-2022 11:10, Julian Gilbey wrote:

Please unblock package spyder and spyder-unittest

(If this isn't the correct Usertags to use, please forgive me - I
couldn't figure out a better one.)


We don't have a usertag for this situation yet, so unblock is totally fine.


The binary packages of spyder (spyder, python3-spyder and
spyder-common) are all "Architecture: all".  However, the 5.x versions
of spyder (the previous one in stable was 4.x) now depend on
python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine, which is only available on six
architectures.  For this reason, spyder's autopkgtest has seen a
regression on ppc64el and s390x as the package is no longer
installable on those architectures.


Ack


spyder-unittest depends on spyder, and so has exactly the same issue.
And when spyder-notebook and spyder-terminal are ready, they will face
the same as well, in spite of being Architecture: all.


Please let us know when that happens.


I don't know how to handle this situation - can the package be allowed
to migrate to testing and only appear in the Packages file for those
architectures on which python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine is available?  If
not, what should I do?
Send the e-mail that you did. You're hitting a bug in britney (our migration software) that it doesn't check properly if source packages that build only arch:all binaries have all their dependencies met when it schedules the autopkgtests. We will enable the package to migrate. 


Spyder is a popular package and it would be very sad if it were not in
Debian in the future.


O, definitely. I was surprised it got uninstalled on my own system.


unblock spyder/5.3.0+dfsg1-7
unblock spyder-unittest/0.5.0-3


Those don't work ;), but I add the right hint: force-skiptest.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: