Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2022-02-11 13:24:16) > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2022-02-11 12:08:52 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: rm > > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> > > > > uglifyjs v2 was last updated upstream in 2017, and has no real > > maintainer in Debian since December 2020 - see bug#958117 > > > > The package should not be released with bookworm, but may still have > > reverse (build-)dependencies, and I therefore request removal only from > > testing for now. Please advice if another approach is more sensible. > > So this is the same request as #968137. The current situation is: > > I: [2022-02-11T12:19:15+0000] - trying: -uglifyjs > I: [2022-02-11T12:19:15+0000] - skipped: -uglifyjs (0, 33, 62) > I: [2022-02-11T12:19:15+0000] - got: 123+0: a-3:a-0:a-0:a-0:i-119:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-1 > I: [2022-02-11T12:19:15+0000] - * amd64: rails, ruby-uglifier Package requested for removal is src:uglifyjs, building binary package node-uglify which provides virtual package uglifyjs. Packages (build-)depending (unversioned or with only lower bounds) on "uglifyjs" should _not_ break: Such dependency is satisfied by package src:uglify-js, building binary package uglifyjs. (i.e. there are 2 packages, one with and one without dash) > Checking reverse dependencies... [ false positive satisfied by src:uglify-js snipped ] > ruby-uglifier: ruby-uglifier Current upstream code FTBFS with Uglifyjs: see bug#981224 v2 branch currently in Debian unstable last update upstream in 2015: https://github.com/lautis/uglifier/tags?after=v3.0.0 > # Broken Build-Depends: [ false positives satisfied by src:uglify-js snipped ] > class.js: node-uglify Bug#979888 > flightgear-phi: node-uglify Bug#979902 > jquery-coolfieldset: node-uglify Bug#979906 > jquery-lazyload: node-uglify Bug#979911 > jquery-reflection: node-uglify Bug#979907 > jquery-watermark: node-uglify Bug#979943 > jquery-caret.js: node-uglify Bug#979934 > jquery-simpletreemenu: node-uglify Bug#979940 > jquery-throttle-debounce: node-uglify Bug#979886 > raphael: node-uglify (>= 1.1.1-2~) Bug#979937 > ruby-rails-assets-favico.js: node-uglify Bug#979962 > ruby-rails-assets-jquery-fullscreen-plugin: node-uglify Bug#979955 > ruby-rails-assets-perfect-scrollbar: node-uglify Bug#979936 > ruby-uglifier: libjs-uglify (see reasons at build-dependency above) > slick: node-uglify Bug#979954 > sockjs-client: node-uglify (>= 2.0) Bug979958 > If you want to get uglifyjs removed from testing, there needs to be an > upgrade path to uglify-js 3.15.0 or all of these packages need to be > updated. So what's your plan here? I have no plan. What plan might be sensible? > > (I tried to get the package auto-kicked from testing by filing > > release-critical bug#958117 but evidently that didn't work.) > > uglifyjs is a key package, so auto-removal does not apply. What does "key package" mean? Simply that other packages (build-)depend on it, or perhaps some manually maintained list by the release team? If the latter, then please remove src:uglifyjs as key package and instead treat src:uglify-js as key package. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature