Control: reassign -1 src:r-cran-sf 0.9-7+dfsg-1 On 2021-02-06 17:42:49 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/r/r-cran-sf/10272506/log.gz > > ... > autopkgtest: WARNING: package r-cran-sf is not installed though it should be > autopkgtest: WARNING: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable - calling apt install on test deps directly for further data about failing dependencies in test logs > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > Reading state information... > Package r-cran-s2 is not available, but is referred to by another package. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source > > E: Package 'r-cran-s2' has no installation candidate > pkg-r-autopkgtest FAIL badpkg > blame: r-cran-sf > badpkg: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable. A common reason is that your testbed is out of date with respect to the archive, and you need to use a current testbed or run apt-get update or use -U. > autopkgtest [08:56:22]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary > run-unit-test PASS > pkg-r-autopkgtest FAIL badpkg > blame: r-cran-sf > badpkg: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable. A common reason is that your testbed is out of date with respect to the archive, and you need to use a current testbed or run apt-get update or use -U. > > > > > r-cran-s2 does FTBFS on 32bit, and it is not obvious how to fix > that quickly (problem is related to using BIGNUM from OpenSSL). No, r-cran-sf needs to unbreak its tests as it did in 0.9.6+dfsg-2. This is a regression introduced in 0.9-7+dfsg-1. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature