Hi Jonas, On 17-09-2020 09:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu ghostscript_9.53.1~dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "re-sync symlinks with newer release of fonts-urw-base35" > > A new release of fonts-urw-base35 was introduced to unstable, and > ghostscript need to symlink direct paths for those fonts (not go through > fontconfig) which requires a rebuild when font is updated. Without having looked at details myself, but what does it mean if we wouldn't do this? I.e. is ghostscript broken? If so, only in unstable because fonts-urw-base35 won't migrate? If the answers are yes to the first and no the second there is something wrong with dependencies. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature