Bug#924025: marked as done (unblock: lua-sql/2.3.4-1)
Your message dated Sat, 9 Mar 2019 11:01:47 +0000
with message-id <20190309110147.GA1236@powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#924025: unblock: lua-sql/2.3.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #924025,
regarding unblock: lua-sql/2.3.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
924025: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924025
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lua-sql
lua-sql was kicked out of testing due to a FTBFS against mariadb-10.3
(#918387) which was fixed in mariadb-10.3 (#919373).
lua-sql has now been given back and the binNMUs have succeeded. No
(source) changes to lua-sql are required (which is still at the
version that is also in stretch).
I'm not personally interested in lua-sql (which is a leaf-package), I'm
just cleaning up after the mariadb-10.3 transition (and this should be
the only (remaining) package being kicked out solely by mariadb-10.3's
fault).
unblock lua-sql/2.3.4-1
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:20:48PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Please unblock package lua-sql
>
> lua-sql was kicked out of testing due to a FTBFS against mariadb-10.3
> (#918387) which was fixed in mariadb-10.3 (#919373).
> lua-sql has now been given back and the binNMUs have succeeded. No
> (source) changes to lua-sql are required (which is still at the
> version that is also in stretch).
Unblocked. For general readers, this is *not* a re-entry precedent but in
this case it hasn't been out for long, it's got a long history of this
version in multiple releases and it wasn't really this package's fault it
got removed. Similar requests might get the same sort of evaluation but
it's not guaranteed.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
--- End Message ---
Reply to: