Re: Advocating for unstable->testing flow
Greetings, Mattia and Release Managers,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:51:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:55:00AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
Greetings, Fellow Debianites and Release Managers,
I would like to advocate for two pacakges to enter testing if no critical bugs
are found in them:
Please file a proper unblock bug for each of them, stating your case
there.
Mails in the mailing list are easily overlooked, and the regular process
asks for bugs anyway.
Understood, in fact I did that right after having sent the mail to the mailing
list.
- isospec: a very small library for science;
This one is already in buster, and looking at the changelog I think it
should really be unblocked (using -march is a RC bug, you should
actually file one affecting the version in buster and fixed in
unstable…)
Done with a mail to control@bugs.debian.org.
- daps: an all-architecture package to build documentation;
Also for this package, have I made an unblock bug report.
Thank you for your attention and your work,
Sincerely,
Filippo
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Filippo Rusconi, PhD
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Scientist at CNRS
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://msxpertsuite.org
http://www.debian.org
Reply to: