Bug#923740: unblock: pacemaker/2.0.1-1
Ferenc Wágner:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Please advise about the situation with Pacemaker.
>
> At the moment pacemaker_2.0.1~rc5-1 is 6 days old in unstable (it was
> uploaded on the day following its release) and now that it finally built
> on all architectures (it triggered a linker bug on amd64) I expect it to
> migrate to testing this week, well before the full freeze.
>
> However, Pacemaker 2.0.1 final was released today and includes a single
> code change only, with the following commit message (the change itself
> is the deletion of lines at the end of the debdiff below):
>
> High: libcrmcommon: complete interrupted live migrations correctly
>
> 8435966 (2.0.0) got the sense of compare_version() wrong when
> attempting to remove the old behavior for recording partial live
> migrations, instead re-introducing it.
>
> This causes a regression in behavior when a transition containing a
> live migration is aborted after the migrate_to has been initiated
> but before the migrate_from has been initiated. In that case, it
> would schedule a full start on the destination node rather than a
> migrate_from.
>
> I think we should release buster with Pacemaker 2.0.1, thus with this
> fix and the small documentation fixes also bundled with it. The added
> include directives just make previously indirect includes explicit, and
> our build doesn't use the abi-check script, so that change is a no-op.
> Full debdiff from 2.0.1~rc5-1 (which is on its way to testing):
>
> [...]
>
> Even if I uploaded 2.0.1-1 now, it would miss the freeze date by a day,
> kicking out 2.0.1~rc5-1 as well, which would be quite a shame,
> considering that it's almost as good as the final, and definitely better
> than 2.0.1~rc4-1 currently in testing. Could you please provide a way
> for 2.0.1-1 final (not uploaded yet) to reach buster?
>
> Thanks,
> Feri.
>
> unblock pacemaker/2.0.1-1
>
Hi Feri,
Thanks for filing the report.
Please let the current version of pacemaker as it is and then ping us on
this bug once it have.
Thanks,
~Niels
Reply to: