Bug#907626: release.debian.org: Release status of non-Rust architectures?
- To: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Cc: YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com>, 907626@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#907626: release.debian.org: Release status of non-Rust architectures?
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:43:43 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] f85e047a-a2a1-af2a-17db-c789270d2da2@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 907626@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20181010104728.GC27189@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- References: <20180830100546.GA13431@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> <20180830100546.GA13431@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> <CAKcpw6Xt2B8SNkuubUq-0WCEPbTgDAWN+RZCeoNASM10_fyz0w@mail.gmail.com> <5a880cc7-4ed5-15d7-bd33-8972d5b08fc5@debian.org> <20181010104728.GC27189@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> <20180830100546.GA13431@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk>
On 10/10/2018 12:47, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 10:21:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Any progress on that? AFAIK the problem is the memory address space limit on
>> mips(el). If we can get that fixed I'm afraid we'll have to resort to partial
>> removals for buster.
>
> Would you be willing to consider similar architecture-specific
> removals on ppc64el (and the rest of the powerpc family, but the
> big-endian flavours are non-release architectures anyway), if
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895723 cannot be
> resolved?
>
> (We also have a librsvg test failure on mips64el, but I think that's
> resolvable, even if only by increasing the tolerance for minor rendering
> differences.)
Thankfully all release architectures now have rust, and the librsvg issue on ppc
got solved/worked around, so this bug is moot. Thus closing it.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: